Actually I always thought it was "Let's get outta here" or a variation, but there you go. . .
Showing posts with label Favorite Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Favorite Movies. Show all posts
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Saturday, June 12, 2010
On Avatar, 3D and Living in a 2D World
We finally watched Avatar on Blu-ray last night, and it got me to thinking about the 3D craze. We're currently living in the third 3D age, after its heyday in the 50s, and a revival in the 80s. It's supposed to be better now, but I have no real way of knowing.
I was born with a lazy eye, you see. I wore an eye patch starting at the age of two to try to correct it. It ended up making the weak eye stronger, and the strong eye weaker. The wonders of 60s medicine. So when I was five, I had corrective surgery. Nice image, right? Popping your eyeballs out, cutting and stitching, popping them back in. I'd like to see that in 3D! After that, my eyes pointed in the same direction (most of the time), but I never really acquired true 3D vision. My brain compensates for it, and I don't often have a problem perceiving the world. I suck at sports though!
I see the world through one eye--usually the left--with the other acting as peripheral vision. So, I've always had a problem with ViewMasters, binoculars and the like. They force my brain to look through both eyes at once, and it takes a lot of concentration. Same thing happens when I put on a pair of 3D glasses. But I keep trying.
The first successful 3D movie experience for me was Captain EO, the Michael Jackson movie at Disneyland. Occasionally--but not for the entire picture--the 3D would kick in, and wow! Things just zoomed around in open space. So, I finally could see what all the fuss was about. More recently, I've gotten a couple of 3D DVDs, namely The Final Destination and Friday the 13th Part 3. During the latter, the effect would come and go, and in the former, I gave up, and switched to the 2D version.
The thing is, I don't know if modern 3D works for me in a theater, because I haven't tried it yet. In the theater, they give you chunky Morey Amsterdam-style black frames with polarized green/grey lenses in them. They're big, and encircle your field of vision. At home, they're still stuck with the little cardboard jobbies, with red and blue lenses. The eyeholes are too small, and the cardboard is too short to fit over real glasses. They're terrible. Worst of all, they render everything in unnatural colors, making you feel like you're watching a badly colorized black-and-white movie.
As for Avatar, the disc did not come in 3D. But the movie is so visually dazzling, I think the effort involved in seeing it in 3D might have fried my brain anyway. They've come a long way with CGI people, but it helps that these people are big, blue aliens. It's still not 100% natural, so I don't think actors need to worry about being completely replaced just yet. The storyline of Avatar is spare, but quite enjoyable. There are nods to other James Cameron films, notably the futuristic military apparently working for corporate interests, as in Aliens. There's even a nifty update of the power-loader Ripley drove. . .uh. . .walked in (get away from her, you bitch!). Oh, and Ripley herself (Sigourney Weaver).
The film is very long, made easier at home by taking an "intermission" about halfway through. Of course, we had to since our bargain basement Magnavox Blu-ray player froze, necessitating a reboot. My cheapo player also glitches about every ninety seconds, marring the beautiful Pandora landscape. Magnavox will soon be replaced by Sony or Panasonic, count on it. Anyway, I liked Avatar quite a bit, though I'll always wonder what it would have looked like in 3D.
Surely there will be a 3D version for the new 3DTVs. But I think early adopters of those sets have got to be in very low numbers, and I think they're nuts to spring for them now. I doubt 3DTV will catch on in a big way until the images are truly 3D with no glasses required. Picture the 3D chess game in Star Wars, more holography than photography. THAT I'd be able to see!
I was born with a lazy eye, you see. I wore an eye patch starting at the age of two to try to correct it. It ended up making the weak eye stronger, and the strong eye weaker. The wonders of 60s medicine. So when I was five, I had corrective surgery. Nice image, right? Popping your eyeballs out, cutting and stitching, popping them back in. I'd like to see that in 3D! After that, my eyes pointed in the same direction (most of the time), but I never really acquired true 3D vision. My brain compensates for it, and I don't often have a problem perceiving the world. I suck at sports though!
I see the world through one eye--usually the left--with the other acting as peripheral vision. So, I've always had a problem with ViewMasters, binoculars and the like. They force my brain to look through both eyes at once, and it takes a lot of concentration. Same thing happens when I put on a pair of 3D glasses. But I keep trying.
The first successful 3D movie experience for me was Captain EO, the Michael Jackson movie at Disneyland. Occasionally--but not for the entire picture--the 3D would kick in, and wow! Things just zoomed around in open space. So, I finally could see what all the fuss was about. More recently, I've gotten a couple of 3D DVDs, namely The Final Destination and Friday the 13th Part 3. During the latter, the effect would come and go, and in the former, I gave up, and switched to the 2D version.The thing is, I don't know if modern 3D works for me in a theater, because I haven't tried it yet. In the theater, they give you chunky Morey Amsterdam-style black frames with polarized green/grey lenses in them. They're big, and encircle your field of vision. At home, they're still stuck with the little cardboard jobbies, with red and blue lenses. The eyeholes are too small, and the cardboard is too short to fit over real glasses. They're terrible. Worst of all, they render everything in unnatural colors, making you feel like you're watching a badly colorized black-and-white movie.
As for Avatar, the disc did not come in 3D. But the movie is so visually dazzling, I think the effort involved in seeing it in 3D might have fried my brain anyway. They've come a long way with CGI people, but it helps that these people are big, blue aliens. It's still not 100% natural, so I don't think actors need to worry about being completely replaced just yet. The storyline of Avatar is spare, but quite enjoyable. There are nods to other James Cameron films, notably the futuristic military apparently working for corporate interests, as in Aliens. There's even a nifty update of the power-loader Ripley drove. . .uh. . .walked in (get away from her, you bitch!). Oh, and Ripley herself (Sigourney Weaver). The film is very long, made easier at home by taking an "intermission" about halfway through. Of course, we had to since our bargain basement Magnavox Blu-ray player froze, necessitating a reboot. My cheapo player also glitches about every ninety seconds, marring the beautiful Pandora landscape. Magnavox will soon be replaced by Sony or Panasonic, count on it. Anyway, I liked Avatar quite a bit, though I'll always wonder what it would have looked like in 3D.
Surely there will be a 3D version for the new 3DTVs. But I think early adopters of those sets have got to be in very low numbers, and I think they're nuts to spring for them now. I doubt 3DTV will catch on in a big way until the images are truly 3D with no glasses required. Picture the 3D chess game in Star Wars, more holography than photography. THAT I'd be able to see!
Posted at
Saturday, June 12, 2010
by
James Greenlee
Labels:
Favorite Movies,
New Technology
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Favorite Movies: Hello Mary Lou: Prom Night II

Image from Wikipedia
I'm wayyy overdue for a frivolous, non-political post. The blog has been entirely too serious of late! So today, I was thinking of some of my favorite movies, trying to come up with something that I haven't highlighted before. That put me (as it often does) in the 1980s, and my interests in those days usually led me to the horror movie aisle at West Coast Video.
When the home video craze took off, the horror genre was really booming. There were countless sequels and knock-offs. Many, many bad horror films came out of the '80s. During the Halloween season, I highlighted many of the bad ones here on the blog, the good ones, funny ones too, but I forgot one.
Scream queen Jamie Lee Curtis followed up Halloween I & II with a middling entry, Prom Night. And while that movie wasn't terrific, it was a hit. So it was of course followed by a sequel. But the producers of Hello Mary Lou: Prom Night II took a different and less obvious tack with their sequel. It was scary, gory, had high production values, and it was also funny. And completely unrelated to Part I.
None of the stars of the film rose to prominence, though 80s stalwart, Michael Ironside is there. But the movie has crackling dialog, an interesting plot, and definitely deserves a second look. The tone is similar to Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV version), with its high school-comedy-horror vibe. Add it to your fright night list!
And before you think that this post is utterly irrelevant, it should be noted that the original Prom Night is being remade, and is due out in April!
Check out the original trailer:
UPDATE: Here's a quote I was hoping to find a clip of, but couldn't. Picture Mary Lou and the Priest from the above video. This is the scene that opens the movie:
Mary Lou Maloney: Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. It has been three months since my last confession. I've disobeyed my parents many times. I've taken the Lord's name in vain many times. I've had sinful relations, with boys at my school. Many boys, many times.
Priest: My child, these are great sins. You must prepare yourself for the consequences.
Mary Lou Maloney: Father, there's just one more thing.
Priest: What is it, my poor child?
Mary Lou Maloney: I loved every minute of it.
Source: IMDB.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
