Showing posts with label Illegal Wiretapping. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illegal Wiretapping. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

N.S.A Wiretapping Program Found to be Illegal


It's about time something from the Bush Era was declared illegal. For the life of me, I still cannot understand why the Obama Administration has covered so much for George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and the rest of that misbegotten crew.

Thanks to Stupid Monkey Planet for the link.

[Excerpt]

Federal Judge Finds N.S.A. Wiretapping Program Illegal

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the National Security Agency’s program of surveillance without warrants was illegal, rejecting the Obama administration’s effort to keep shrouded in secrecy one of the most disputed counterterrorism policies of former President George W. Bush. . .

Read more at: The New York Times

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Bush to Tap Private Computer Networks?


Photo from source, Think Progress

All I can say is, huh? What? Really? You've got to be kidding me.

[Excerpt]


The Bush administration wants to place more black boxes on private-sector computer networks. We’ve already learned a lot about the NSA wiretap program and its Narus STA 6400 splitter — that’s the black box that AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein reported the NSA placed at a major node for voice and Internet communications (inside this secret room). . .

Read more at: Think Progress

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Will Clinton Support or Oppose FISA Bill?


Daily Kos has a great diary up regarding the FISA/Telecom Immunity bill. Their pointed question to Senator Clinton, is will she support or oppose the bill? Excellent question, which I will be waiting anxiously for.

[Excerpt]

Well, Senator Clinton?

Earlier today, Barack Obama's campaign released an unequivocal statement on telecom immunity:

"To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies."

That is clear, and welcome.

Hillary Clinton is now the lone holdout among presidential candidates in the Senate, hedging on whether she will support a filibuster of any bill that contains retroactive immunity rather than just maybe one specific one. . .


Read on at: DailyKos.com

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Action Alert: Do Something About FISA Bill


I received the following letter today, and urge anyone reading this to take action.

Tell Your Senators: No Amnesty for AT&T and Verizon Lawbreaking

Democrats in the Senate appear to have caved again to the Bush administration's fearmongering tactics. This time, they've negotiated a 'compromise' fix to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) sought by Bush that grants full retroactive amnesty to the telecom giants for participation in his illegal program to spy on Americans.

But why amnesty? Bush wants retroactive immunity for the telecom companies to thwart civil liberties lawsuits that threaten to expose his own violations of the original FISA law. If these lawsuits aren't allowed to go forward, we may never know the extent of the Bush administration's illegal efforts to spy on American citizens without the required warrants.

Senator Rockefeller of West Virginia -- flush with new contributions from telecom company executives -- has pushed a draft bill through the Senate Intelligence committee. But Senator Dodd of Connecticut has courageously stood up and requested a "hold" on this bill until the retroactive immunity is taken out.

Regrettably, though, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid does not seem ready to respect the Senate's tradition of honoring another Senator's "hold," so Senator Dodd may be forced to actually filibuster the bill. To show support for Senator Dodd on this issue, all of our senators need to hear that we support him in resisting retroactive immunity for violations of our constitutional rights.

Thank you for working to build a better world.

Will Easton, Manager
ActForChange.com/Working Assets

White House Cut Deal on FISA


This story is getting interesting. So the White House cut a deal with the Senate Intelligence Committee to pass a FISA bill, along with immunity for the telecommunications companies? And they didn't let the Judiciary committee in on the details? Hmmm.

It will be interesting to see if the White House cuts the same deal with the Judiciary, or if they have to come up with a new strategy. I guess it depends on if that whole wire-tapping dealie had scooped up some intel on the Intelligence members, eh?

[Excerpt]

Senators Say White House Cut Deal With Panel on FISA
Senate Judiciary Committee members yesterday angrily accused the White House of allowing the Senate Intelligence Committee to review documents on its warrantless surveillance program in return for agreeing that telecommunications companies should get immunity from lawsuits.

Judiciary Committee Chairman
Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.), the ranking Republican, said any such agreement would be "unacceptable," signaling that legislation granting immunity to certain telecom carriers could run into trouble. Leahy and Specter demanded that the documents, which were provided only to the Intelligence Committee, be turned over to the Judiciary Committee as well. . .

Read the whole story at: WashingtonPost.com

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

They're Listening to You Too

John Aravosis of AmericaBlog has a very alarming post up right now regarding the electronic surveillance the Bush Administration has been conducting. Basically, if the government can monitor communications between the US and a "terrorist state," they then claim the right to do the same with the US-based persons calls to others. And their calls to others. And so on, wash, rinse, repeat.

I happen to have a family member who is from Iran. So, if he calls his family, and the government taps him, they then claim the right to tap him when he calls me. And if you've talked to me, they can tap you. Doesn't seem very American, does it? But don't worry, they tell us. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about. You can trust the Bush Administration. . . Oh, and I have emailed John Aravosis too.

[Excerpt]

If you've ever emailed me, the government has the right to your email records

TPMmuckraker asks the following question today: "Quick, has anyone you know emailed anyone who's called Pakistan lately?"

The question reflects the Bush administration's new standard for permitting the federal government to illegally spy on your phone records. If you have been in contact with Party X, and Party X has been in contact with Party Y, and Party Y has contacted anyone in Pakistan, then any conversations, email or phone or otherwise, that you've had with Party X can be turned over to the government by our friendly phone companies in violation of federal law. . .

Read on at: AmericaBlog.com

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Update: More Info on FISA Changes


Photo from source, NewYorkTimes.com

The more I read about this, the more uneasy I get. And my "crossed fingers" that Democrats in Congress know what they're doing are past cramped, and turning gangrenous. When they come back in session, they'd better address this, because by then, I think they're going to have a firestorm on their hands.

NOTE: This is a revised version of the New York Times story I excerpted earlier, with updated information.

[Excerpt - emphasis mine]

Concerns Raised on Wider Spying Under New Law

WASHINGTON, Aug. 18 — Broad new surveillance powers approved by Congress this month could allow the Bush administration to conduct spy operations that go well beyond wiretapping to include — without court approval — certain types of physical searches on American soil and the collection of Americans’ business records, Democratic Congressional officials and other experts said. [snip]

The dispute illustrates how lawmakers, in a frenetic, end-of-session scramble, passed legislation they may not have fully understood and may have given the administration more surveillance powers than it sought. [snip]

Several legal experts said that by redefining the meaning of “electronic surveillance,” the new law narrows the types of communications covered in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA, by indirectly giving the government the power to use intelligence collection methods far beyond wiretapping that previously required court approval if conducted inside the United States. . .

Read the whole story at: NewYorkTimes.com

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Russ Feingold: Lessons Not Learned



Photo from Wikipedia.com


Russ Feingold is one of my favorite politicians. He speaks his mind, regardless of how the political wind is blowing. Politicians are basically actors, and they're very good at showing us what we want to see. I don't get that vibe from Senator Feingold. He seems genuine to me, and I don't think I'm particularly gullible.

That said, Sen. Feingold is currently speaking his mind over at HuffingtonPost.com, about the recently passed spying legislation. It's good. I agree with him. The latitude I've personally been giving Congress is waning, the more I read about this. Check it out:

[Excerpt]


Six years ago, in the aftermath of 9/11, Congress rammed through the USA PATRIOT Act with little consideration of what that bill actually contained. Five years ago, Congress authorized a reckless and ill-advised war in Iraq. One year ago, Congress passed the deeply flawed Military Commissions Act. And late last week, a Democratic Congress passed legislation that dramatically expands the government's ability to conduct warrantless wiretapping, which could affect innocent Americans. It is clear that many congressional Democrats have not learned from those earlier mistakes, two of which happened when Democrats controlled the Senate. Once again, Congress has buckled to pressure and intimidation by the administration.

It should go without saying, but it's important to repeat: every member of Congress supports wiretapping terrorists. And no one thinks that the government should have to get a court order to listen to communications between suspected terrorists in foreign countries, even if those communications happen to pass through the U.S. The FISA bill Congress passed late last week was the latest example of the administration exploiting a legitimate problem to make an outrageous power grab - and unfortunately, it was also just the latest example of Congress giving in to the president's fear-mongering. . .

Read more at: HuffingtonPost.com

Thursday, August 2, 2007

More Greg Palast: On Data Mining


Greg Palast is overdue to burst through to the public consciousness. If you haven't read his stuff yet, do so now.
[Excerpt]
Busted & Crimes of The Times
Published August 1st, 2007 in Articles
By Greg Palast

Cutely buried in the 18th paragraph in a story about Alberto Gonzales on Sunday was a slyly-worded updated confession by the New York Times that, in 2004, the Bush Administration leaned on its editors to spike a story about illegal invasions of citizens’ private records (”data mining”). The Times editors smothered the story. They finally ran it - a year later - after Bush was safely re-elected.

As a journalist, this makes me want to throw up.

For two reasons:

To find out the reasons, you must visit: GregPalast.com
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...