 |
Black Walnut with two scoops of vanilla. Image from Politico. |
Herman Cain's biggest problem (aside from the possibility that he really did sexually harass and assault several women) is that he's such an unpolished politician, he has no idea how to handle it. His obvious instinct is to obfuscate (lie). Then he'd change his story (usually with another lie), while insisting that his story has been consistent. He's also very fond of using language that is too precise. Like saying things like "exonerated" or that there was "nothing" to any of the charges, that they had been found "baseless." Hmm, baseless charges that begat at least two large payouts to the claimants?
And then he just makes stuff up. He's made up a big "Democrat machine" that is
smearing him (oddly, factual revelations of past charges is a smear), then grudgingly acknowledges he--again--doesn't have facts to back that up. I used to say that George W. Bush reminded me of what would happen if my step-dad were pushed onto a stage, and told to
be the President. Well, ol' Herman is like my dad on a bender. I've heard he's not ready for prime-time. But he's not ready for BET. Or even Comedy Central (okay, maybe that one).
Oddly, the right-wing spin machine has decided that Cain is a saint, and that all the women are fame whores. . .or just whores. They've decided that sexual harassment is always a fraud. They're standing by their man. If I were them, I'd be as worried about his
greenness, his
dimness and his willingness to
lie as I would be about the allegations.
[Excerpt]
For Herman Cain, two named accusers; one flat denial
Offering a stout response to two women who have accused him of acting improperly, GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain said Tuesday that he’s not a sexual harasser and will not allow the swirling controversy to derail his campaign.
“The charges and the accusations, I absolutely reject,” he said. “They simply didn’t happen. They simply did not happen. . .”
Read more at: Politico