"As Members who believe that DOMA is unconstitutional and support the President’s decision to stop defending it, we believe that the law is not factually or legally justifiable and were interested in hearing what arguments might possibly be made in its defense."
In response, they got this (non-) answer:
"Following the Department of Justice decision to stop defending a law passed by strong bipartisan majorities in Congress, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group voted to retain counsel to defend the law."
So, much like the past four or five GOP presidential debates, the questions are not really answered.
Read more at: Washington Blade
No comments:
Post a Comment
Have something to say to us? Post it here!