I'm catching up on the Sunday morning political shows on the DVR, and am presently in the middle of FOX "News" Sunday, the lowest-rated (for a network that constantly touts ratings, this is noteworthy) and lowest quality of the group. Newt Gingrich, with his Kermit the Frog voice (seriously, look away and listen) was up first, with Howard Dean. Jesse Jackson was next, and then the famous--and ridiculously named--"Power Panel." By far, the biggest issue was the Shirley Sherrod/Andrew Breitbart faux racism story.
Notably, the host, Chris Wallace, was very prickly about exactly when FOX "News" actually aired the notoriously out-of-context video from the NAACP. Wallace claims that FOX never aired the clip before Sherrod resigned. This is only partially true, and a very disingenuous point. Bill O'Reilly, who tapes his program, The O'Reilly Factor rather than airing it live, was on the air saying that Sherrod "must resign" before the announcement was made, by bare minutes. But this means he had recorded it hours earlier. Also, FOXNews.com had already reported on the issue, with absolutely wrong information, such as stating that Sherrod was a government employee at the time of her story (which was really 24 years ago). FOX Nation (the extremely far right blog site) was also discussing the story in an unfavorable light. I have no doubt that Sean Hannity's and Glenn Beck's radio shows (which air earlier than their FOX shows) were already on this issue as well. So Wallace's "FOX never aired" the clip is a slice-and-dice of the facts, at best.
All of this points to the fact that FOX was running with this story. If Sherrod's resignation had come six hours later--or not at all--there can be no doubt that this would have been the 24/7 number one story on FOX. . .which it became anyway. What the White House was trying to prevent--in a regrettable, stupid fashion, I'm not afraid to note--is exactly what did happen. They wanted to squash a bad news cycle in the midst of a pretty good policy week, and they failed. Exactly when FOX aired the clip, is a bit of false framing, as though their journalistic integrity was the reason for holding back. BULL PUCKY. Clearly, this thing was a go, and all of Wallace's protestations can't make that go away.
I guess I am missing the point. Who cares when Fox aired the news about Sherrod? And even if it does matter, I believe CNN was running the story first and was ripping on the Obama administration and how they handle the situation.
ReplyDeleteMy problem is how the Obama administration handled the problem and why are the concerned about Fox?
The Obama administration screwed up big time and acted in bad faith to Sherrod. Fox news is just an excuse. Te real problem is with the Obama administration and how they behaved.
I don't disagree, Dan, except that I wouldn't say it's the ONLY problem. FOX has been fanning the flames of these bogus race-related stories for a while now. Sean Hannity practically invented the term "reverse racism."
ReplyDeleteIt seems to be either in an effort to scare receptive white people, or something. If Sherrod had really turned out to be a super-hatin' racist, would that really be news? If there was ONE racist within the NAACP. I'm sure there are actual ones there. What gives the story such inflated significance would be my question.
Nobody in this story comes off well (except Sherrod). Aren't you glad you didn't run with it?