 |
| This, I'm assuming, is not the woman in question. Image from Politico |
[Excerpt]
Herman Cain allegation: Accuser breaks silence
The attorney for one of the women who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment said Friday that the then-National Restaurant Association CEO engaged in “inappropriate behavior” and “unwanted advances” that led to a cash payout in 1999.
The woman declined to reveal her identity or detail the nature of the claim. . .
Well then, they can't say she's some sort of fame-seeker, can they?
Read more at: Politico
"The woman declined to reveal her identity or detail the nature of the claim. . ."
ReplyDeleteIs the woman Anita Hill?
Okay, first, who says Anita Hill was lying? And second, this woman is the anti-Anita Hill, as she does not want to become a public figure, and did not release details on this matter, but wants to set the record straight that the incident DID happen.
ReplyDeleteThere are now multiple women alleging his bad behavior and at least two large payouts. The right is trying to say this is a "smear." How can a recounting of something that actually happened be a smear?
The hilarious thing is that this "leak"--though Limbaugh and Hannity speculated otherwise--very likely came from the Right, or from the NRA, NOT the left. The left would LOVE, LOVE, LOVE to have Herman as the nominee!!!