Even though it seems clear that Herman Cain--at best--had a bit of a problem expressing himself appropriately to women in the 90s, oddly, Republican voters don't seem to care. Somehow, Rush Limbaugh and his fellow spinners have convinced the dittoheads that sexual harassment isn't real, it's a liberal plot, the women were sluts, or other such drivel. In fact, they're still calling the original report of Cain's settlements with two women a "smear," even though Cain admits it happened.
So, I don't know which is worse: a) that Herman Cain, an obviously non-serious candidate, is the frontrunner of the GOP candidates; or b) Cain holds onto that position while he refuses to address these charges.
[Excerpt]
Sharon Bialek accuses Cain of "sexually inappropriate" behavior
A Chicago woman accused Herman Cain on Monday of trying to get sexual favors
more than a decade ago in exchange for his help finding her a new job just after
she had lost her post at an arm of the restaurant association he was then
running. . .
Read more at: CBS News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have to wonder... if this is the beginning of the women who said "No!"...
ReplyDeleteCan you imagine how many may have said "Yes..."???
Hold the sausage! (That's what she said!)
ReplyDelete